Sunday, February 26, 2006

February 26, 2006 NAB Meetings

NAB Meeting

February 26, 2006

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the sixteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 7:40AM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President), Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator), and Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator); McConihay was replaced by Vanessa Cerny of Rutgers University. All new NAB regional representatives were present for the meeting as well. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) was selected to hold votes for the conference coordinators.

Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) moved for the meeting to go into executive session. Shane Sheridan (Northwest Region President) seconded and the motion passed.

To start the meeting NAB discussed which questions they would be asking for office interviews. The questions asked to the interviewees go as follows:
- What is your name? Give us a quick background on yourself? Why you are running for NAB office?
- What do you see as some duties of the NAB office?
- What skills do you have that would help you in the office and as a member of NAB?
- How does this job fit into your schedule and priorities?
- Would there be any support from local and state organizations provided to you as you perform this job?

At 7:45AM NAB started with interviews by interviewing the NAB Business Manager interviewees. At 8AM the team interviewed the NAB Secretary interviewees. At 8:50AM the team interviewed the agriculture consortium candidates. For the agriculture consortium interviews NAB elected to temporary replace Vanessa Renwick (2006 Northwest Region President) with April Mendenhall (Colorado State University) and for Voorhies to be replaced by Antoine Jefferson (Louisiana State University).

Next, Sheridan moved to dissolve the task force and Voorhies seconded the motion; motion passed.

Voorhies then moved to recess till the National Business Meeting, which would be taking place later in the day. Sheridan seconded and the motion passed.

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the eighteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 5:45PM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President), Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator), and Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator); McConihay was replaced by Vanessa Cerny of Rutgers University. All new NAB regional representatives were present for the meeting as well.

At this time NAB interviewed the final agricultural consortium candidate. Then all of the new NAB officers were selected.

Lastly, NAB went over the banquet agenda and responsibilities. To start, Bolte will introduce the new regional presidents to the NAB board. Next, Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) will announce the new NAB Business Manager. Third, Krumm will announce the new NAB Secretary. Fourth, Voorhies will announce the new agricultural consortium liaison. Then Sheridan will introduce the regional scrapbook of the year winners and then announce the national scrapbook of the year. He will follow by doing the same for club of the year.

At 6:50PM Sheridan moved to adjourn the final and last 2005-2006 NAB meeting; Voorhies seconded and the motion passed.

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm
NAB Secretary

February 26, 2006 NAB Meetings

NAB Meeting

February 26, 2006

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the sixteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 7:40AM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President), Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator), and Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator); McConihay was replaced by Vanessa Cerny of Rutgers University. All new NAB regional representatives were present for the meeting as well. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) was selected to hold votes for the conference coordinators.

Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) moved for the meeting to go into executive session. Shane Sheridan (Northwest Region President) seconded and the motion passed.

To start the meeting NAB discussed which questions they would be asking for office interviews. The questions asked to the interviewees go as follows:
- What is your name? Give us a quick background on yourself? Why you are running for NAB office?
- What do you see as some duties of the NAB office?
- What skills do you have that would help you in the office and as a member of NAB?
- How does this job fit into your schedule and priorities?
- Would there be any support from local and state organizations provided to you as you perform this job?

At 7:45AM NAB started with interviews by interviewing the NAB Business Manager interviewees. At 8AM the team interviewed the NAB Secretary interviewees. At 8:50AM the team interviewed the agriculture consortium candidates. For the agriculture consortium interviews NAB elected to temporary replace Vanessa Renwick (2006 Northwest Region President) with April Mendenhall (Colorado State University) and for Voorhies to be replaced by Antoine Jefferson (Louisiana State University).

Next, Sheridan moved to dissolve the task force and Voorhies seconded the motion; motion passed.

Voorhies then moved to recess till the National Business Meeting, which would be taking place later in the day. Sheridan seconded and the motion passed.

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the eighteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 5:45PM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President), Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator), and Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator); McConihay was replaced by Vanessa Cerny of Rutgers University. All new NAB regional representatives were present for the meeting as well.

At this time NAB interviewed the final agricultural consortium candidate. Then all of the new NAB officers were selected.

Lastly, NAB went over the banquet agenda and responsibilities. To start, Bolte will introduce the new regional presidents to the NAB board. Next, Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) will announce the new NAB Business Manager. Third, Krumm will announce the new NAB Secretary. Fourth, Voorhies will announce the new agricultural consortium liaison. Then Sheridan will introduce the regional scrapbook of the year winners and then announce the national scrapbook of the year. He will follow by doing the same for club of the year.

At 6:50PM Sheridan moved to adjourn the final and last 2005-2006 NAB meeting; Voorhies seconded and the motion passed.

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm
NAB Secretary

Saturday, February 25, 2006

2006 National Business Meeting~ Columbus, Ohio

National Collegiate 4-H Business Meeting
February 25, 2006


Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the 2006 National Collegiate 4-H Business Meeting to order at 11:55AM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. At this time, national club dues collection was closed. Also, Bolte briefly discussed the voting procedures for the meeting.

The first item of business was the NAB Secretary’s Summary. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) gave a brief overview of the last national business meeting which took place in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. There were three constitutional amendments and two resolutions passed. Due to the length of the previous year’s meeting, Krumm offered only highlights of the meeting to the delegates. If anyone wanted to know more information, Krumm said to talk to her. Emily Morehouse (University of Illinois) moved to accept the secretary’s summary. Mary Baughman (The Ohio State University) seconded and the motion passed.

Next, Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) gave the NAB Business Manager report. First he discussed the statement of activities of the past year. There was a friendly correction of to state that Haley Cook was from Iowa State University. Then, Baughman moved to accept the NAB Business Manager’s Statement of Activites. Morehouse seconded and the motion passed. Next, Goebel discussed the proposed budget for the 2006-2007 year. Jeff Johnson (Iowa State University) moved to accept the 2006-2007 Budget. Miranda Reiman (South Dakota State University) seconded and the motion passed.

Bolte next gave the NAB Summary Report. He discussed the previous year. Also, he told delegates about the NAB Blog (http://collegiate4hNAB.blogspot.com) and told them if they wanted more information they should look there, as it has all of the NAB’s minutes for the past year.

Next in the meeting, committee reports were given. First, Voorhies gave the Web Team report. He reviewed the past year’s events and made an emphasis on the new www.collegiate4h.org website. Also, he announced the new Web Team members. The new Web Team members are Jessica Falkenthal (Indiana University), April Mendenthall (Colorado State University), and Voorhies. Then, Krumm gave the Advocacy Team report. She reviewed the team’s past year accomplishments and also announced the new Advocacy Team members. The new members are Mendenthall (Colorado State University) and Heather Powell (Auburn University). Then Shannon Glaspell (West Virginia University) gave the Task Force report. She reviewed the history of the team and discussed the listening sessions & message boards. On behalf of the Task Force she thanked the delegates for their feedback and briefly went over the team’s recommendations. She also announced the Task Force would hand out their website IPod at the banquet later in the night. The final committee report was supposed to be from USDA, but it was pushed back to the banquet instead.

There was no old business presented, so the meeting moved directly into new business where resolutions were first presented.

Resolution 1 was written by Cindy Sperry (UC Davis), Samantha Ephgrave (Member-at-Large), Voorhies, Vanessa Renwick (UC Davis), and Goebel. It was about creating national Collegiate 4-H bylaws. There was no motion for debate. Baughman (The Ohio State University) moved to previous motion on the resolution and Lisa Parker (Texas Tech University) seconded and it was approved. The delegation then voted on the Resolution 1 and it passed.

Resolution 2 was written by Falkenthal (Member-at-Large). It was about creating a national Collegiate 4-H recognition and achievement committee to update existing and creating new contests and recognition methods for outstanding clubs and members. There were a couple minutes of discussion from delegates. There was no motion for debate. Morehouse (University of Illinois) moved to previous motion on the resolution and Baughman (The Ohio State University) seconded and it was approved. The delegation then voted on Resolution 2. Voorhies called for a division count. Resolution 2 passed.
Amendment 1 was written by NAB. It was about restructuring the administration of national Collegiate 4-H, NAB, in Article III of the constitution. Renwick (UC Davis) made a friendly amendment to replace each emeritus with second year. This friendly amendment was passed. Ephgrave (Member-at-Large) moved to amend the amendment by adding Section Q to Article III as: This act shall become effective at the 2007 National Collegiate 4-H Conference upon passage and approval. Powell (Auburn University) seconded. There was then discussion for the full length from the delegates. Voorhies then moved to add a minute and a half to discussion; Shane Sheridan (Western Region President) seconded. After the extra discussion, Tommy Inglis (University of Nevada) moved for debate. Melissa Novak (University of Missouri – Columbia) seconded. Point of order at this time was called by Voorhies. Debate then began. The pro side was represented by Ephgrave (Member-at-Large) and Michelle Craig (Auburn University). The con side was represented by Inglis (University of Nevada, Voorhies, and Sheridan. After the debate, Baughman (The Ohio State University) called to previous section. Morehouse (University of Illinois) seconded and it was approved. The delegation then voted on the amendment to Amendment 1. Voorhies called for a two-thirds division. The amendment to Amendment 1 failed. Voorhies then moved to change the effective date to immediately. Morehouse (University of Illinois) seconded. Novak (University of Missouri) called previous question; Inglis (University of Nevada) seconded and it was approved. The delegation then voted on the amendment to Amendment 1 of have the effective date to immediately. Ephgrave (Member-at-large) called for division. The amendment to Amendment 1 failed. Novak (University of Missouri) moved to change the effective date to February 26, 2006. Hannah Englin (South Dakota State University) seconded. Antoine Jefferson (Louisiana State University) called to question; Jeff Johnson (Iowa State University) seconded. Motion passed. Voorhies moved to close discussion on Amendment 1. Johnson (Iowa State University) seconded and it passed. Jefferson (Louisiana State University) moved to debate and Michael Holcombe (Rutgers University) seconded. Motion passed. The pro side was represented by Voorhies and Sheridan. The con side was represented by Jefferson (Louisiana State University), Goebel. After debate, Ephgrave (Member-at-large) moved to table indefinitely. Craig (Auburn University) seconded. Motion failed. Voorhies moved to previous question; Jefferson (Louisiana State University) seconded. Motion passed. The delegation then voted on Amendment 1 as revised with a date of February 26, 2006. Ephgrave (Member-at-Large) called a point of order. After several recounts throughout the business meeting Amendment 1 passed.

Amendment 2 was written by Ephgrave (Member-at-Large) and Criag (Auburn University). It was about voting rights for the Southern Region in several sections of Article II. Ryan Curtis (The Ohio State University) called a point of order. There was discussion to took place by several delegates. Cindy Sperry (UC Davis) made a friendly amendment of making the voting rights affect not just the Southern region but the National organization. Inglis (University of Nevada) moved to previous question. Holcombe (Rutgers University) seconded and it passed. The delegates then voted on Amendment 2 with its friendly amendment. Amendment 2 passed.

Amendment 3 was written by Sheridan, Jordan Sonnenberg (Colorado State University), Renwick (UC Davis), Sperry (UC Davis), and Novak (University of Missouri). It was about making NAB meetings open by amending Article IV by adding sections C and D. Discussion then began. Jefferson (Louisiana State University) called question on the discussion. Glaspell (West Virigina University) moved for debate. Johnson (Iowa State University) seconded. Michael Cooley (Iowa State University) then called to previous question. Johnson (Iowa State University) seconded and it was approved. The delegation then voted on Amendment 3. Renwick (UC Davis) called for division. Amendment 3 failed due to the count of abstention votes.

Amendment 4 was written by Ephgrave (Member-at-Large), Renwick (UC Davis), Sperry (UC Davis) and Craig (Auburn University). It was about changing the definition of a member-at-large in Article II, Section A, Part 3. Delegates then discussed the amendment. Novak (University of Missouri) moved for previous question. Jefferson (Louisiana State University) seconded and it passed. The delegation then voted on Amendment 4. Amendment 4 passed.

Amendment 5 was written by NAB. It was about the National Service project in Article VII, Sections B, C, and D. Delegates then discussed the amendment. Voorhies made a friendly amendment to remove annually. Jefferson (Louisiana State University) moved to previous question. Baughman (The Ohio State University) seconded and it passed. The delegation then voted on Amendment 5. Amendment 5 passed.

Next the National Service projects were discussed. There were two proposed National Service Projects. The first proposal was from Falkenthal (Member-at-Large) and the second proposal was from Iowa State University Collegiate 4-H which was presented by Cooley. Falkenthal’s service project included making a resource library. Cooley’s service project was having an emphasis on community service with the Operation Military Kids program. The delegates then discussed both proposals. Morehouse (University of Illinois) moved to accept both projects. Baughman (The Ohio State University) seconded and the motion passed.

Reiman (South Dakota State University) moved adjourn the meeting. Baughman seconded the motion passed. The meeting was adjourn.

Then there were some quick announcements. The first announcement was from Bryon Garrett from the USDA over the purpose of NAB, the strategic planning committee, and what the organization needs to do to work as a national organization. Also, there was an announcement about the national listserv and club recognition would be done by National 4-H Week 2006. Next, the Agricultural Consortium committee was discussed. Anyone interested was asked to talk with a member of NAB. Also, the role of a strategic planning committee was discussed. At the end of the announcements the delegation gave applause for Bolte who was the NAB chair for the year. Lastly, the National Conference planners discussed the rest of the day’s activities.

The delegation left for their community service projects at 1:10PM (EST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm
NAB Secretary

February 24, 2006 NAB Meeting

NAB Meeting

February 24, 2006

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the fifteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 1:05PM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President) and Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator); McConihay was replaced by Vanessa Cerny of Rutgers University. Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator) was in an out through out the meeting. Bryon Garrett from USDA was present for most of the day, as well as up to three guests were present through out the meeting.

Discussion started with an update from the task force. The task force discussed their report, reviewed the history of the group, and went over the listening session process.

The task force is willing to hear comments and recommendations from any delegates. They’d like to see this work continue. One way for members of the task force to continually be contacted about the report, the group is compiling a list of the task force members with their contact info. Each member had different parts of the report that they worked on. There were several different areas where emphasis was put within the report. During the task force’s report to NAB they brought up how they’d like to see collegiate 4-H work with NAE4-HA; they already have a volunteer and contact with this group. The task force will present a short summary to tomorrow’s delegation at the national meeting.

Talk next focused on the strategic planning committee. Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) reinstated that this committee is for members and should be done by members. He brought up how he’s not comfortable with the structure of the group. He also brought up worries on having old nab stay on one more year. There was a lot of discussion within the group over these issues. The conversation then focused on how this group will not be restricted to themselves and that they will be able to gather information from anywhere. They can conduct surveys and have discussions with different groups. Then the group explained the current NAB system’s structure and how it has equal representation. With the new NAB Article III constitution amendment discussion started pertaining to the need to remove the word ex-officio. The group decided that this could be changed to second year. This can be done by a friendly amendment being approved at the meeting tomorrow. Garrett wanted to make sure that the group keeps in focus what is the validity of collegiate 4-H as a national organization.

The next part of the meeting consisted of judging the national scrapbook of the year and the national club of the year. Northeast, North Central, and the Southern regions all turned in scrapbooks and club of the year applications. Western region had no national scrapbook and national club of the year applications for this year. Due to certain voting members having their own clubs up for awards there were some substitutions for member’s votes. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) voted for Bolte for the national scrapbook of the year application. Krumm voted for the conference chairs for the national club of the year application. Bethany Krowne from Ohio State University voted for the conference chairs for the national scrapbook of the year. Creenna Sheely from Arkansas University voted for Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) for national club of the year. Scrapbook and club of the year judging started at 2:30PM (EST).

At 4:50 PM (EST) the national scrapbook and national club of they year application were done being judged. The winner will be announced at Saturday’s banquet. Discussion then moved to the NAB workshop. Bolte reviewed his presentation with the group and the group determined that in the workshop Krumm would explain the advocacy team, Voorhies would explain the web team, and bolte would discuss NAB to the group. The original idea of discussing USDA by Garrett will just be done at banquet.

Next, the group went over the national business meeting agenda. It will start with calling the meeting to order and then it will follow with roll call. During roll call Krumm will ask for the number of members, advisors, and at the end she will ask for members at large. Cerny volunteered to distribute voting cards during roll call to all due paying clubs. Next will be the approval of the secretary’s summary report; in interest of time, NAB has decided to condense the minutes of the previous national conference and they will be printed on the back of the agendas. A full copy can be found with Krumm if any member would like to review them. Krumm will create the summary. This will be followed by the business manager’s report of the statement of activities and then will be followed by the approval of the proposed budget for 2006-2007. Then there will be the presentation of the NAB summary report. Next will be a couple committee reports: the web team, advocacy team, task force, and USDA update. Currently there is no old business. New business will start with going over the presented resolutions. The first resolution concerns collegiate 4-H bylaws and has been written by Cindy Sperry, Samantha Ephgrave, Voorhies, Vanessa Renwick, and Goebel. This will be resolution 1. The second resolution concerns the recognition of clubs and has been written by Jessica Falkenthal. This will be resolution 2. The first amendment presented is over article III of the constitution and has been written by NAB; this will be bill 1. The second amendment concerns voting action and has been written by Ephgrave and Michelle Craig. This will be bill 2. The next amendment concerns the open meeting policy and has been written by Sheridan, Jordan Sonnenberg, Renwick, Sperry and Melissa Novak. This will be bill 3. The next amendment concerns membership at large and has been written by Ephgrave, Renwick, Sperry, and Craig. This will be bill 4. The next amendment concerns the national service project of emphasis and has been written by Voorhies. This will be bill 5. Next in new business will be the national service project of emphasis. Then there will be announcements about the strategic planning committee, the national listserv & club registration during national 4-H week, the agricultural consortium, and the national conference in 2007. It was decided that one hundred copies will be made of the agenda and secretary minute summary. Also, there will be sixty copies made of the budget, resolutions, and amendments. It was also decided that Goebel will now be the timer during the national business meeting; there will be three minutes for the introduction of the amendment, three minutes allowed for discussion, five minutes for debate, and one minute for voting.

Next, Voorhies moved to accept all applications of the web and advocacy teams and to make them our new teams. Leidheiser seconded and the motion was approved. Web team members include Voorhies and Falkenthal. Advocacy team members include April Mendenthall and Heather Powell.

Voorhies moved to recess till 7:30AM (EST) on Saturday, February 25, 2006. Sheridan seconded and the motion passed at 6PM (EST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm

NAB Secretary

Friday, February 24, 2006

February 23, 2006 NAB Meeting

NAB Meeting

February 23, 2006

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the fourteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 9:25AM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President) and David Hartley (Reference Liaison); Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) arrived late and was in and out during the meeting. Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator) and Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator) were also in an out through out the meeting. Bryon Garrett from USDA was present for most of the day, as well as up to four guests were present through out the meeting.

To start the meeting, discussion continued from the previous day about the national listserv. It was said that the listserv should have a no reply all option and an unsubscribe option. Also, a couple members wanted to make sure that the listserv would be continuously updated. Gathering information on active clubs during national 4-H week was brought up again. It was suggested that the web team set up the listserv with multiple moderators, that the advocacy team would promote the listserv, and that the NAB secretary would compile the information from the listserv and for the active membership list. It was also decided that everyone is going to be on the national listserv that is at conference this year and then they’ll have the option removing themselves from the listserv. The national listserv will be announced at this year’s national conference.

Next, Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) gave the web team report. The website is currently compiled at constructed. You can visit the website at www.collegiate4h.org. This year’s web team is proposing that there are upcoming dates, headlines, NAB information, an online directory of all the clubs nationwide, a photo gallery, and a message board on the website. They’d also like to see a club spotlight section and a feature story section where the web team could work with the advocacy team. They’d also like to see that there’d be a link to the NAB Blog. Also, there could be conference information, a resource library with past workshop information, leadership information, and advocacy materials located on the website. Also there could be a section that would explain relationships with the USDA, NAB, and regional areas. Also, applications could be posted on it too. The website is meant to be a one stop shop for all collegiate 4-H news. Another idea that was discussed within the web team was of having a hall of fame section that could highlight past national club of the years, past NAB members, etc. The proposed budget for next year’s web team totals $185.00.

The next item of discussion was the agriculture consortium. Voorhies discussed this leadership event, as he was the representative to this event earlier in the year. The history of this consortium is that two years ago a group of sixteen organizations got together, one of which was collegiate 4-H. They have created a curriculum called Collegiate Life Knowledge. Nothing in this curriculum deals with agriculture; it deals with group and individual improvement. All of the groups involved in the consortium have an agricultural background, but their goal isn’t agriculturally directed. Samples of the Collegiate Life Knowledge program include possible work shops dealing with teams and time management; there are around thirty to forty workshops available through this program. One question that arose was why collegiate 4-H would want to continue working with this consortium. Members brought up how this would be a way to get new ideas. Also, the only money that would go into this opportunity would be paying for a training to take place at a national conference at some point in time and if we’d have more than one liaison. We could get the training at any time and as much as we’d like. Another question that arose was who would want to continue to be as a liaison. The Collegiate Life Knowledge only pays for one organization representative. Voorhies brought up how the other organizations have kept their original people still as liaisons, and that maybe we could have a liaison for a couple of years too. He then brought up how currently there are no college students on the board besides him, so he brought up issues of youth and adult partnerships and youth in governess. Currently the group is mainly comprised of executive directors. It was then brought up that it is hard to find curriculum for college students and that this program is aimed for this age group. Voorhies volunteered to continue being a liaison. Sheridan then brought up a shadow idea where an out going member could be shadowed and new member could be shadowing the entire time, so there’d be two liaisons. This could maybe turn into a position like secretary and business manager. This position will be put on the agenda as new business at all of the regional meetings. It will be asked if anyone who would like to apply sign up and interviews will then take place on Friday from 5:30 to 6:00PM. It will be known as a collegiate organization consortium and that NAB will be selecting a liaison to serve on this consortium. These liaisons will report to NAB about the information gained.

Bolte then presented the wrap up report that he created to NAB and it will then be presented at the national business meeting. The wrap up report includes all major events that NAB did through the year. All NAB members were given the chance to make suggestions and corrections to the wrap up report. Both the wrap up report and a proposed budget will be presented to the delegates at the national business meeting.

Next Goebel passed out a statement of activities done in the account and a proposed budget to NAB for review. He discussed the details of the current budget and account and then the proposed budget for next year. The proposed budget starts with a remaining balance of $1,264.19. There is an estimated amount of revenue of $1,250.00 coming from national dues which then gives total revenue of $2,514.19. Expenses include money going towards NAB leadership grants, consortium liaison, web team, advocacy team, and miscellaneous which totals $1,735.00. This gives a remaining balance of $779.19. Sheridan moved to present the proposed budget to the national body; Voorhies seconded. Motion passed. Goebel also wanted everyone to know that he has copies of all receipts if anyone needs to look them.

Voorhies then moved to recess the meeting till 12:15PM (EST); Sheridan seconded. Motion was approved at 11:40AM (EST).

The group returned from recess at 12:30PM (EST).

To start off the meeting formal introductions took place of all members.

Next the Northeast region’s current secretary said that she gave NAB voting rights of their region to Shannon Glaspell from West Virginia University. Voorhies moved to accept the proxy of giving Glaspell voting rights. Sheridan seconded; motion was passed.

It was next announced that the task force report was emailed out to all NAB members and it will be presented to the board on Friday at 1:00PM (EST).

Next Krumm game an advocacy team report. She went over the different ideas that the team came up with. Ideas include having a NAB liaison, having a display board, having representation at national events, working with the web team, promoting the national listserv, creating the national conference newsletter, and creating national quarterly updates. Both the advocacy team and web team will present their complete proposals to both the new and old NAB on Friday at 5:30PM.

The next item of business was the voter orientation workshop. Bolte, Voorhies, Sheridan and Krumm met earlier in the week on Monday, February 20th and discussed ideas about the workshop and came up with an outline. Members discussed how the point of the workshop is to inform delegates about collegiate 4-H and the national business meeting and how it will not be a discussion period. Hard copies of the constitution and amendments will be available at the orientation and at the meeting for members, as well as an electronic copy that will be linked to on the Blog. It was recommended that all NAB members would be present for the workshop. The workshop will be optional for all delegates at the conference, and will be highly recommended for all delegates that will be voting. The workshop will start with the introduction of all NAB members. Then the workshop will move into going over the constitution. Key sections of the document that were decided to be highlighted during this section include Article II Sections A, B, and D, Article V Section D, Article VII Section B, Section C Part3 and Part 4, and Article XI. A copy of the club establishment guidelines will also be available for members to review during this section of the workshop. The third section of the workshop will be about parliamentary procedure. Basic rules on motions and voting will be discussed during this section. The fourth section will be about amendments. There will be a sample for presenting an amendment discussed and also the differences between an amendment and a resolution. The differences between an amendment and a resolution will then work into a group discussion and activity. Examples of amendments and resolutions will be presented in front of the group and then the group will talk about what is what. Members though five examples would be good. The fifth section will be an area where the national business meeting’s agenda and proposed amendments will be reviewed. It was again emphasized that this will not be a discussion or debating time, but a time when the amendments will be reviewed. The sixth section will be about all of the collegiate 4-H bodies including NAB, USDA & National 4-H Council, the advocacy team and the web team. This will be an area where Article III will be discussed. To conclude the workshop there will be a time for questions to be asked. Krumm and Sheridan volunteered to help Bolte making and preparing for the workshop.

Next, Voorhies moved to remove from table the discussion about the national service project of emphasis (NSPE). Sheridan seconded; motion passed. Krumm let the group know that two applications have been turned in to her; one application is from Jessica Falkenthal from Indiana University at large and the other application is from Iowa State University. There was an idea that there should be a proposed constitutional amendment to be supported by NAB to subtract the exact details of NSPE that are currently stated in the constitution and that the NSPE would be voted on by the delegates, that there will always be one, and that a time frame is needed. Voorhies volunteered to write the amendment. It will be up to the club’s discretion on what timeline and idea they will do. There will need to be a plan of implementation as well. All applications will need to be turned in twenty-four hours before the national business meeting to NAB.

Next, Glaspell reminded the group to make sure that there is a positive atmosphere during the conference and that any discretions should be kept to a minimum. Garrett then recognized the historical start of 4-H is one thing, but the need to address the current and the future is another thing. There are issues that need to be addressed and priorities for next year and the next couple of years and so on that needs to be determined. He told the group that these types of issues are happening in organizations every where. The discussion then moved into an idea to create strategic planning for several years and from several levels of collegiate 4-H. This could include a future plan, mission, vision and objectives. Goebel added that NAB should start a committee now and that it could include the task force, existing NAB, and new NAB. There was a lot of discussion that by the members concerning a strategic planning committee. Then the discussion moved into changing the duration of a NAB term. Ideas about having two year terms where there’d be in a way junior and senior NAB members. The Garrett brought up another idea where there’d be two year terms but different regions would have turn over at different times. This would help increase continuity within the group.

Voorhies moved to have a thirty minute recess. Sheridan seconded and motion passed at 3:00 PM (EST).

At 3:40PM (EST) discussion was restarted.

Discussion continued with the change of collegiate 4-H governess. Sheridan added that he liked the full rotation of old and new NAB members. It’d be a way to open up more representation within the region. The old members would be there for guidance and could work on the vision of the collegiate 4-H program. The new members would work more on day to day functions. The idea was for only the regional representatives would continue for a second year. They’d be known as ex-officio members during their second year. At this time the group reviewed parts of the task force report. Then there was an idea that there could be two secretaries as well. One could deal with NAB functions and the other could work more with the advocacy team. Then members discussed how the advocacy team should choose their liaison to NAB. They’d also be a liaison with the web team and could be in charge of newsletter business. This position would work with the NAB secretary too. The NAB secretary would then take minutes at NAB meetings and would primarily deal with NAB business. This second secretary would be known more as an advocacy team liaison. Then the discussion went back to the idea of having ex-officio members. Talk led to that these members would have voting rights. This new member position then puts into question the current student rule. It was discussed that this rule wouldn’t need to be in affect for the ex-officio members. These members would just need to remain active in collegiate 4-H activities at local and regional levels. Ideas evolved to that the ex-officio positions would deal with the development of the implementation of strategic planning and would be responsible for developing partnerships for organizational evaluations. Members then decided that Article III for the current constitution needed to be rewritten for these changes. Duties of the advisor and business manager then came in to question and change. Members then made a reconstructed Article III of the constitution to read as follows:

Article III – Administration (National Action Board)

A. The administration of the National Collegiate 4-H Organization shall be vested in a nine (9)-member board, as well as non-voting members including secretary, business manager, advisors, and committee liaisons, known as the National Action Board, hereafter to be referred to as the NAB.

B. The voting NAB members shall be made up of the elected regional representative from each of the four regions, the National Conference Coordinator, and ex-officio NAB members.

C. Ex-Officio NAB shall be comprised of the four regional representatives from the previous year.

D. NAB members must be college students enrolled during the office span with the exception of NAB advisors and ex-officio NAB members.

E. Ex-officio NAB members no longer enrolled in school may retain their position if they remain active in collegiate 4-H activities at the local and regional levels.

F. Should any regional president/representative member withdraw or transfer to a college or university outside of their elected region, resign, or otherwise become ineligible or unable to perform the duties of their office, the affected region shall appoint a replacement.

G. The regions of the National Collegiate 4-H Organization shall be the same as the USDA/Extension System regions.

H. Each region shall elect their regional representative to the NAB. The region hosting the next National Collegiate 4-H Conference will also elect a National Conference Coordinator.

I. Voting members, excluding the National Conference Coordinator, will serve two, one year terms. The first term members will serve as regional representatives. The second term members will serve as ex-officio NAB members. A term is defined as the fiscal year beginning and ending at National Collegiate 4-H Conference.

J. The National Advisors will be an official of the Extension System/United States Department of Agriculture, one representative from the National 4-H Council, and a faculty advisor from the region hosting the next National Collegiate 4-H Conference.

K. Duties of NAB

1. Serve as a liaison between regions. Communicate information and ideas between regions.

2. Responsible for the administrative duties at National Collegiate 4-H Conference

3. Promote club and membership development within the four regions

4. Maintain and distribute monies held in the National Collegiate 4-H account

L. Duties of Ex-Officio NAB

1. Ensure communication of information of national concern

2. Development and implementation of National Service Project of Emphasis

3. Promote Collegiate 4-H nationally through representation of Collegiate 4-H at National 4-H Congress, National 4-H Conference, and other activities deemed appropriate

4. Development of implementation of strategic planning

5. Responsible for developing partnerships for organizational evaluation

M. Duties of NAB Chair

1. Develop preliminary agenda and meeting announcements two weeks prior to NAB meetings.

2. Coordinate non-NAB member agenda requests.

3. Secure meeting arrangements.

N. Duties of NAB Business Manager

1. Conduct all monetary transactions.

2. Maintain a permanent journal of all transactions and a ledger of all accounts.

3. Prepare a report for the newsletter.

4. Prepare a financial statement at the close of each club year.

5. Prepare a proposed budget for the following year.

6. Facilitate committee relations and reports.

O. Duties of NAB Secretary

1. Maintain records of the NAB Executive Board meeting.

2. Keep records of the business meetings of the National Organization

3. Edit and supervise the publication of the national newsletter.

4. Conduct necessary and appropriate correspondence on behalf of the organization.

P. Duties of the advisor(s)

1. Maintain an active and involved role in the organization

2. Regularly attend NAB meetings

3. Be an advocate to Collegiate 4-H to the organization they represent

4. Provide guidance and outside perspectives to NAB

5. Attend and participate in the National Collegiate 4-H Conference

Voorhies moved to recess for fifteen minutes. Sheridan seconded and the motion was approved at 5:45 PM (EST).

Discussion resumed at 6:40 PM (EST).

NAB resumed by talking about the strategic planning committee. It was discussed that this should be made of the four current regional representatives on NAB and then four other elected regional positions with an advisor. Ideas were then discussed about Garrett being the advisor, as well as exploring the idea of working with NAE4-HA and National 4-H Council. Also, the group thought that one of the current regional representatives should serve as the chair of the committee. Voorhies moved to create a committee that will concentrate on strategic planning that will include the four current regional representatives and four elected regional representatives selected by the individual regions by the individual region’s discretion with Garrett serving as the advisor; Sheridan seconded and the motion was approved. At the regional meetings each region will discuss how they will determine their additional regional representative.

Voorhies moved to recess till 1PM (EST) on Friday, February 24, 2006. Sheridan seconded and the motion was approve at 7PM (EST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm

NAB Secretary

Thursday, February 23, 2006

February 22, 2006 NAB Meeting

NAB Meeting
February 22, 2006


Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the thirteenth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 8:40PM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President) and David Hartley (Reference Liaison); Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) arrived late. Bryon Garrett from USDA was present, as well as seven guests.

To start the meeting Bolte discussed the open meeting policy that the meeting was going to follow and run by. There would be ten minutes during the session for non-NAB members to talk and if they wanted to add anything else they’d need to talk to their representative. The meeting was to be held similar to a school board meeting.

Next, Bolte moved the discussion on to reports and updates. The first report given was the Secretary’s report. Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator) moved to accept the meetings as posted on the NAB Blog; Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) second. Motion passed and the secretary minutes were approved.

Voorhies next gave a Task Force update. Currently, the Task Force is reviewing all sections and compiling a report for Friday of this week to present to NAB and for Saturday to present to the entire delegation.

Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator) and Leidheiser followed with a National Conference update. So far they said that they haven’t ran into any problems, and they wanted to make sure that if any member needed anything just to let them know. Also, they wanted to make sure that everyone knew that there was no extra microphone for the national business meeting and that there would be voting cards available for the business meeting. These voting cards are to make delegate votes easier to determine.

The first major item of business was the review of the national service project applications. Discussion started with how the constitution states how the service project is conducted. Currently it states that it is a three year process, where the first year is a planning year and the next two years is when the project is performed. There was some discussion if the constitution should be amended, so there wouldn’t be the one year of a development phase and for there to be just three years of conducting. The talk then moved on to how three years might not work, and maybe how the project should be just one year, or even it could be a ten year project. A ten year emphasis would be a way to have an ongoing project, almost like philanthropy. The Task Force report was brought up as a tool that could help aid in what should be done and could aid in this discussion; it’d be a way to see the overall focus of the Collegiate 4-H organization. The idea of an honor club from one of the visitors was brought up as well; a system to give a point value in a way, to clubs that complete projects and then there could be a way of recognition of clubs that complete the project. Another visitor added that the service project needs to be a part of the current system and curriculum. Also, that we need to make sure that we train members on how to do the projects. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) then made an announcement about the national service project application due date. Krumm accidentally informed clubs that directed question to her the wrong due date of the applications by a of couple days later than the due date of February 17, 2006, so she asked for those clubs that sent applications in to her at a later date would still be accepted. Currently there are two applications. Voorhies then directed the conversation to a program that is set up in the Southern region currently, ideas in motion. This is where ideas are shared for projects to fund raising. The discussion kept on addressing on how there is a constant change in leadership, which sometimes makes it hard for items to be completed. Garrett added that a three year service project limits the ability of movement and for redirection towards current issues, such as disasters. Constant discussion on having a long term emphasis and short tem project kept on repeating during this item of business. Fogt then changed the discussion to how the constitution is continually changing. He added that maybe making a document for changes would be appropriate, that way the constitution wouldn’t keep on getting amended. These changes that are happening every year are operation issues. One guest made the note that the constitution needs to be a firm document and that bylaws would be appropriate. Garrett added that NAB is a representative democracy and that at times it seems that NAB has to do too much with votes and that people get caught up on procedural issues; in order to move forward this needs to stop. Then discussion then moved towards the transparency of NAB and that the visibility of NAB has improved over the past NAB term. Fogt brought up the ideas of bylaws and how this year’s NAB should make a foundation and start to changes. That there should be a group of people getting involved now in making a document that could determine current operational matters. Shane Sheridan (Western Region President) and Fogt will look into options along with any other members on what should be done now. They are planning on making an announcement on Thursday night of conference to invite the delegation to participate in the discussion. Near the end of the conversation for the night it was talked about deleting section b, c, and d of the constitution under the national service project. This would eliminate all of the exact details that NAB is currently working and discussing now. Leidheiser moved to table the discussion and Sheridan seconded; motion approved.

The next major item of business was the national business meeting. Bolte said that there should be reports from the Advocacy Team, the Web Team, and the Task Force, along with an update from Garrett. He also talked about the NAB status issue dealing with transferring to a different college within your region if you are the region president. It was brought up that the group of people talking about possible bylaws should add this to their discussion. Krumm announced that no amendments had been sent to her as of before the start of the meeting; there is an anticipated four to five amendments. A guest next brought up the voting delegate talking rules. They wanted to see if anyone can say anything during the meeting or if it’d be restricted to voting delegates only. This issue was then directed to the bylaw group. It was also discussed that the agenda and amendments needs to be made available prior to the meeting and that posting it on the Blog would be a good way of doing so. The agenda and amendments will also be available as a print copy. The procedure of discussion will start with five minutes of open discussion and then it will move onto a pro/con section of debate. Krumm will be in charge of keeping track of time. Then the discussion moved into how proxy works. Goebel finished the discussion by saying that he will need to talk at the meeting about highly recommending the completion of club establishment outlines, as well as, due paying clubs will have voting rights.

Next, Krumm brought up the idea of establishing a national listserv. She and Bolte discussed how names and emails of all due paying members could be put into a listserv and a database. This would be a way for members across the nation to receive information on applications, to getting updated about national conference, to being a helpful tool for the Advocacy Team in promoting information nationally. Also the database would be a way to determine an accurate number of Collegiate 4-H members across the nation. Sheridan brought up that club listservs could be used rather than individual emails. Discussion then flowed into what determines a due paying or active member. The discussion led to that this would be up to the individual club’s discretion. Several different ideas were then discussed on the listserv. Members wanted to make sure that the listserv was voluntarily and that there’d be a way to moderate messages. Fogt brought up that during registration on Thursday members could be asked if they’d like to join the listserv or not; it’d be a way to start on the process. Then discussion moved on how to get an accurate number of members. Suggestions ranged from asking clubs twice a year to once a year how many active members they had. Garrett gave a suggestion on making it during National 4-H Week and that there could be a campaign during that week for everyone to get their membership information in to the NAB secretary or maybe the web team.

Leidheiser moved to recess till 9AM (EST) on Thursday, February 23, 2006 and Sheridan seconded; motion passed.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:50PM (EST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm
NAB Secretary

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

February 18, 2006 NAB Meeting

NAB Meeting

February 18, 2006

Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the twelfth meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 12:35PM (CST) over a teleconference. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President) and David Hartley (Reference Liaison).

The first items of business were reports. The first report given was the Secretary’s report. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) said the last meeting’s minutes were posted on the NAB Blog. Secretary minutes were approved.

Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager) gave his report next. Goebel went over several items about reimbursements and the budget. He made sure that a receipt would be obtained from the Ohio State University club for the rooms that were going to be paid for by them for the Wednesday before conference. He also told the group that those that would be staying in a NAB room that weren’t NAB members could make their checks out the National 4-H Council. Currently, the total account has $2,300.79; after Krumm receives her reimbursement for the Advocacy Team brochures there will be around $2,059. Left over money in the budget is around $150, which doesn’t include the cost of the Wednesday night rooms. For next year’s proposed budget, Goebel recommended that there be $500 budgeted towards the Advocacy and Web Teams. Next year’s budget will be proposed by this year’s NAB and then approved by the delegation at this year’s national business meeting; there were a couple of members that discussed this item of business.

There were no regional updates given at this meeting.

Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) gave a Web Team update next. The website, www.collegiate4h.org, will be debuted at the beginning of the week for the National Conference. The website will have an initial skeleton that next year’s team can continue with or change. Also, the Web Team is planning on giving next year’s team some ideas and visions about the website for the future.

Following the Web Team report, Krumm gave an Advocacy Team update. She said that the Advocacy Team is printing the newsletters on Sunday the 19th and will have those and the pamphlets available on the Wednesday before conference to be put into and then distributed in the delegate’s bags. The Advocacy Team is planning on meeting in the early afternoon to go over a proposal for next year’s team.

Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator) next gave a national conference update. First she made sure that NAB didn’t need anymore additional times and rooms for meeting before and during conference. Next she thanked everyone for their travel information. Mary Baughman from Ohio State University should be emailing everyone about conference arrival and general information soon. Leidheiser will be the first Ohio State University member at the hotel on the Wednesday before conference. She is planning on being there around 1:30PM. She reminded everyone that there will not be anyone at the airport on Wednesday to help people get to the hotel, but that there is a shuttle that goes from the airport to the hotel. Lastly, she asked for opinion for the evaluations for conference. Leidheiser wanted to know what NAB wanted evaluated about the national and regional meetings. A couple members gave suggestions about communication, how easy the meetings were to understand and follow, the time usage, the room set up, the meeting’s effectiveness, and if what was set out to be accomplished was accomplished.

Next on the agenda was old business. The first item discussed was room arrangements for the Wednesday night before conference. Voorhies set up room assignments after the last meeting and sent those out to all NAB members. Bolte brought up that Hartley might not be coming a day early any more and that Voorhies should talk with Hartley. Leidheiser informed NAB members that some people will have to check out on Thursday and then check back in to their new rooms on Thursday.

Old business continued with NAB outlining and making an agenda for each of the NAB meetings. During Wednesday’s meeting NAB will discuss the budget (which Goebel will already have a draft prepared), go over national service project applications, and will discuss the national business meeting. Bryon Garrett from USDA will be present at the meeting on Wednesday too. Nothing was set for Thursday’s meeting during the meeting. Friday’s meeting will include judging national scrapbook of the year, national club of the year, looking over advocacy and web team applications, and getting all of the amendments printed and ready. Saturday morning interviews will be conducted for NAB secretary and business manager. It was also discussed that someone will need to pay for copies, keep a receipt and then will get reimbursed after the conference. Copies will need to be made available for amendments. It was also discussed that amendments will be posted online too.

Next, NAB discussed its open meeting policy. It was determined that the meeting will go as normal with ten minutes for non-NAB members to talk. If a non-NAB member wants to say something before the ten minutes they will have to talk to their representative and they will have to bring forth their ideas.

The outline for the national business meeting was discussed next. NAB decided to add this to Wednesday’s meeting time to create. Also, NAB made sure that there would be microphones, a projector, a table or cart, and a laptop available for the meeting room.

Last under old business, Voorhies let the group know that a Microsoft Word document of the Collegiate 4-H’s constitution was found. It needs to be updated with last year’s amendments. Krumm will update the constitution. Then she will email it to NAB; Voorhies will then post it on the www.collegiate4h.org website and then he’ll give the link to Krumm who will then add the link to the NAB Blog.

First on new business was the idea of putting together a summary or review report of NAB. Bolte volunteered to write the wrap-up report. If any NAB member has anything they’d like put in the report they need to email Bolte with those items. Krumm recommend that Bolte use the NAB Blog as a tool for creating the report. During Wednesday’s NAB meeting the report will be looked over.

Last for new business was NAB’s voter orientation workshop. It was discussed that final details of the workshop could be put together on Wednesday. Voorhies, Bolte, Krumm, and Shane Sheridan (Western Region President) will be getting together via teleconference on Monday, February 20th at 10:30PM (CST) to make an outline of the workshop.

The next meeting will take place on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 7PM (EST) in Columbus, Ohio.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 1:50PM (CST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm

NAB Secretary

Monday, February 06, 2006

February 5, 2006 NAB Meeting

NAB Meeting
February 5, 2006


Justin Bolte (North Central Region President and NAB Chair) called the eleventh meeting of the 2005-2006 NAB board to order at 12:40PM (CST) over a teleconference. NAB Board members that weren’t present for the meeting were Sommer McConihay (Northeastern Region President), Derrick Goebel (NAB Business Manager), and Sarah Leidheiser (Conference Coordinator).

The first item of business was the Secretary’s report. Val Krumm (NAB Secretary) said the January’s meeting minutes were posted on the NAB Blog. Secretary minutes were approved.

Next, David Hartley (Reference Liaison) gave a Task Force update. He said that the Task Force will be passing on their report to NAB after the 13th of the month. Patrick Voorhies (Southern Region President) added that every Task Force member that could, will be coming a day early for the National Conference. The exact number of members is still not determined.

Next Bolte asked for any region updates. Voorhies told the group that the Southern Region’s Vice President will be arriving a day early with him for conference. That way he in a way can be there for both the Task Force and NAB meetings. Shane Sheridan (Western Region President) reminded the group that his Western Region Officer Team will also be coming a day early. There were no more regional reports.

NAB next decided to discuss the absence of McConihay at NAB meetings over the past year. Hartley assured the group that national information was still getting passed on to the region, but there just hasn’t been any presence at the national level since this past spring. He added that he personally had been trying to get a hold of McConihay and has had no luck over the past couple of months. NAB decided that there needs to be a representative on NAB for the National Conference to be fair. Many ideas were given by several members to have the seat open to any North East region delegate. Sheridan added that the spot should be brought up to the attention of their regional officers and one of them should fill in; that they as a region should decide who will replace McConihay. Bolte will let the North East region know they need to find a replacement representative for NAB.

Kyle Fogt (Conference Coordinator) next had a checklist of agenda items to go over concerning National Conference.
The first item was travel information. Fogt gathered information from those at the meeting when they’d be arriving in Columbus and how. All travel information should be email to Fogt with specific times, airlines, etc. as soon as possible.
Next, Fogt was curious about exact rooming details, along with meeting room arrangements for Wednesday and Thursday. At the January meeting NAB approved to pay for two rooms for Wednesday night. Voorhies brought up that the rooms for the Task Force should be covered as well, since they are coming a day early too. This then would equal four rooms to be covered by NAB. Voorhies also made a draft of room assignments for Wednesday night for NAB and Task Force members; he will be sending this information out to all NAB members after the meeting. Many NAB members were concerned about the amount of money NAB currently had to determine if NAB could pay for four rooms.
As for the meeting space, Fogt informed the group that Bryon Garrett from USDA will be at the meetings on Wednesday and that a nice meeting room space or suite would be appropriate to meet in. Also, since the group attending the meetings has kept on getting larger over the past couple of months, NAB needed to find a room to fit everyone in. Fogt volunteered to look into meeting room costs and will send this information to NAB.
Next, Fogt asked questions about the Task Force’s attendance. He was wondering who would be attending and how would it work logistically, if there needed to be two meeting spaces and would the Task Force be meeting at the same time as NAB. Voorhies informed the group that the exact number of Task Force members is still not determined, but that they wouldn’t need their own meeting space and would be able to meet in a hotel room. He also let the group know that they were planning on meeting at the same time as NAB.
Fogt then brought up that we need to determine when NAB will be meeting during National Conference. He had already made a tentative schedule for Wednesday and Thursday, but still needed to figure out times for Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. The group decided that on Wednesday NAB will first meet at 3PM. This will last as long as needed. On Thursday the group will meet in the morning till around 6PM. Fogt said that he’d be willing to look into food options for the group for Wednesday and Thursday; he said that there is a free shuttle to a certain location with many food venues. Fogt will send out a list of places to eat where the shuttle goes. He brought up that it might be nice for NAB to go out for a nice supper on Wednesday night. Voorhies suggested that we needed to remember to not pack lots of decisions till the end during conference. It was addressed to the group that on Friday a possible meeting time would be during a time where two workshops are scheduled back to back. Also, the group could meet during tours. After discussing which was more important educationally and which option gave more time to discuss, workshops or tours, the group decided to meet during tours on Friday. At the next meeting NAB will determine what the group will be discussing during each meeting. Bolte reminded everyone that all amendments must be turned in twenty-four hours before the business meeting and suggested that we provide them on-line.
The next item addressed was when was NAB going to determine award winners, along with the new NAB, Advocacy Team, and Web Team. Several ideas were thrown out for when interviews could be conducted such as in between tours and the evening out on Friday, after the evening out on Friday, or during breakfast Saturday morning. Fogt suggested 7:30AM on Saturday to hold interviews. On Sunday morning there will be time for the new and old NAB and new and old Advocacy and Web teams to meet.
The last National Conference agenda item was items needed for the national business meeting. Bolte reminded the group that he would be bringing his computer and printer. Fogt said there would be a projector and overhead available in the meeting room. Also, some NAB members suggested paper copies of amendments to be available at the regional and national meetings, but that a copy for all delegates wasn’t necessary. Fogt also informed the group that the duration of the national business meeting was almost doubled to an hour and forty-five minutes. This way there wouldn’t be a conflict of time as was seen at last year’s National Conference.

Next, Voorhies told the group that Goebel wouldn’t be able to get to Columbus for the conference until Thursday afternoon due to a class. This meant that someone else would need to step in and collect items at the registration table. Fogt suggested that an Ohio State University member could be in charge of collecting dues, applications, etc.

Next, Krumm gave an Advocacy Team update. The brochures are done and picked up. She will be bringing them with her on Wednesday before conference. She will be sending the receipts and bill to Goebel after the meeting for reimbursement. Also, she reminded the group to send in information for the newsletter by Wednesday, February 8th. The Advocacy Team set up an email for the national newsletter (c4hnewsletter@gmail.com) for items to be emailed to; member Samantha Ephgrave from Oklahoma State University will be compiling all the information for the newsletter. Also the Advocacy Team though it’d be nice for there to be NAB profiles of the members and maybe a welcome to Columbus statement from Fogt and Leidheiser. All items are more than welcomed. Also, Krumm let the group know that the Advocacy Team would be making a proposal for the next year’s team to ensure another successful year.


Next on the agenda was updating the constitution on the USDA’s website with last year’s amendments. Currently the constitution is on a PDF file. Voorhies asked the group if anyone had a Word document of the constitution. It was brought up that Goebel might have it; Krumm informed the group that she never received any of the past NAB’s secretary information. Hartly said he’d look to see if he had a copy and said that if can’t he can’t find it he’d help reconstructing and updating the constitution into a Word document. Sheridan volunteered to help too. Voorhies said he’d send an email out to old NAB members to see if any of them have a Word document of the constitution.


Constitutional amendments to be endorsed by NAB were the following item of business brought forth by Voorhies. He was curious if the group wanted to make an amendment about establishing the Web Team and Advocacy Team and also wanted to see if we as NAB wanted to support the amendment that Bolte was planning on writing about transferring colleges within a region. Amendments could also be concerning liaisons from the Web and Advocacy teams on NAB. Voorhies and Krumm brought up several ideas on the issue at hand. Sheridan and Fogt agreed with Krumm that a constitutional amendment was not necessary for this year. Bolte is still working on the transfer amendment discussed at the January meeting. Bolte is planning on having another person from his school write the amendment.


Currently, the deadlines for the Web & Advocacy Team applications were at the beginning of National Conference on Thursday night. Fogt brought up switching the due date to noon on Friday since NAB wouldn’t decide on them till then. Also, this is a way for these committees to be discussed at regional meetings. Voorhies moved to change the due date of the Web & Advocacy Team applications to Friday of National Conference at noon. Sheridan seconded; motion approved.


At the end of the meeting Bolte asked if anyone else had any other agenda items. Sheridan spoke up and said that he’d like to receive a break down of the NAB account from Goebel. Goebel will be sending this out via email. He also wanted to know who were due paying clubs last year. Voorhies said he had a print copy which gave a general idea of the clubs. Hartley said that last year’s NAB business manager, Tony Rekewg, has a spread sheet with that information. Goebel will be emailing a copy of due paying clubs to Sheridan and the rest of NAB.


Hartley brought up that the group should keep in mind the name and emblem rules of 4-H. It is a rule that you have to have a budget approved by the national organization to use their name and emblem.


Voorhies told NAB that they could work on the voting delegate orientation at the next meeting, since the meeting had gone for a somewhat long duration of time so far.

The next meeting will take place on Saturday, February 18th at 12:30PM CST via teleconference.


The meeting was adjourned at 2:10PM (CST).

Respectfully Submitted,

Val Krumm
NAB Secretary